Two Editors Arguing About Reference Clarity
Lee este artículo en voz alta
Enciende el micrófono y lee a tu ritmo. Las palabras se iluminan sobre la marcha y nadie te detiene por un error.
Tu audio nunca llega a MovaReader: lo reconoce tu navegador. Política de Privacidad
Inicia sesión para guardar esta sesión en tu historial de lectura.
Two Editors Arguing About Reference Clarity
Mina: This paragraph still points to nothing; that pronoun has no antecedent. Oleg: I replaced those vague forms with explicit nouns, but these edits may look heavy. Mina: Such changes are necessary when the former draft hid referents behind substitution.
Daria: The latter section is worse; it opens with cataphora and delays the main claim. Hugo: We ought to trace each chain before resubmitting this manuscript to the journal. Oleg: I did so yesterday, and I will do so again after your comments on section four.
Reviewers questioned the baseline survey, yet Hugo argued that that concern rested on an outdated sample. Oleg repeated the phrase the revision clause at paragraph openings to strengthen lexical cohesion across a manuscript editing dispute in a journal office. This is what the policy team feared most: the
