Email Thread on Manuscript Cohesion
Lee este artículo en voz alta
Enciende el micrófono y lee a tu ritmo. Las palabras se iluminan sobre la marcha y nadie te detiene por un error.
Tu audio nunca llega a MovaReader: lo reconoce tu navegador. Política de Privacidad
Inicia sesión para guardar esta sesión en tu historial de lectura.
Email Thread on Manuscript Cohesion
From: Rita. To: Jon, Meryem. Subject: Cohesion pass on section three. This is the problem: that paragraph uses three pronouns before introducing any stable noun. I revised the opening so these references map cleanly onto the stakeholder forum.
Such a fix should prevent readers from mislinking the former claim to the latter dataset. Please confirm you did so on your side before we merge the branches. Alex added that those distant anaphora might survive only if we repeat the head noun once.
During revision of an email thread between co-authors revising a journal article, Meryem flagged cataphoric openings that delayed clarity for non-expert readers. The committee approved a revised version of the baseline survey, but the earlier one still appeared in the appendix. When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents.
