Lee este artículo en voz alta
Enciende el micrófono y lee a tu ritmo. Las palabras se iluminan sobre la marcha y nadie te detiene por un error.
Tu audio nunca llega a MovaReader: lo reconoce tu navegador. Política de Privacidad
Inicia sesión para guardar esta sesión en tu historial de lectura.
The Art of Passing Over: Paralipsis in Cicero's Forensic Oratory
In the spring of 56 BC, the Roman Forum witnessed one of antiquity's most audacious courtroom triumphs: Marcus Tullius Cicero's defense of his young protégé Marcus Caelius Rufus. Confronting charges of political violence, civil insurrection, and attempted poisoning, Cicero recognised that a direct evidential rebuttal would prove tedious and vulnerable. Instead, he deployed paralipsis, the classical figure whereby an orator professes to pass over or suppress a sensitive accusation while simultaneously presenting every salacious detail. By masquerading as an advocate too discreet to air scandalous rumours, Cicero implanted lethal character assassinations directly into the minds of the Roman jurors.
The focal point of his rhetorical maneuvering was Clodia Metelli, a wealthy patrician widow whose hostility had instigated the prosecution. Under strict Roman forensic decorum, an orator who launched an unprovoked personal assault against a noble Roman matron risked alienating the jury.