Two Editors Arguing About Fronted Clauses

Leggi questo articolo ad alta voce

Attiva il microfono e leggi con il tuo ritmo. Le parole si illuminano mentre procedi, e nulla ti ferma quando una viene pronunciata male.

Il tuo audio non arriva mai a MovaReader: a riconoscerlo è il tuo browser. Informativa sulla privacy

Accedi per conservare questa sessione nella cronologia delle letture.

Two Editors Arguing About Fronted Clauses

11:47 p.m.

Mina pushed the printout across the table.

"That opening is still wrong."

Oleg did not look up.

"It is not wrong."

"It is difficult."

"Those are different accusations."

They had been editing the same essay for three hours. The author was writing about abandoned railway stations and the way cities preserve traces of routes that no longer exist. The prose was intelligent, but every second paragraph seemed determined to announce its intelligence through unusual word order.

The sentence under dispute read:

"Through the broken windows came the smell of wet stone and rust."

Mina tapped it with her pen.

"Why not simply write, 'The smell of wet stone and rust came through the broken windows'?"

"Because the windows matter first," Oleg said. "The sentence begins with the visual frame, then lets the smell enter it."