A Grant Proposal's Limitations Paragraph
Прочитайте цю статтю вголос
Увімкніть мікрофон і читайте у своєму темпі. Слова підсвічуються на ходу, і ніхто не зупиняє вас через одну помилку.
Ваш звук не потрапляє до MovaReader: розпізнає його ваш браузер. Політикою конфіденційності
Увійдіть, щоб ця сесія збереглася в історії читання.
A Grant Proposal's Limitations Paragraph
The limitations paragraph in a national research council fellowship application opened with a frank admission that the sample may not represent national diversity. Anya wrote that the proposed mechanism could suggest a pathway worth testing, not a conclusion already established. Reviewers tend to trust applicants who indicate where uncertainty remains and how the project will address it.
Joel added that preliminary pilots seem to support feasibility, though effect sizes are relatively modest so far. Luca argued that the team should somewhat reduce ambition in the aims section to match what year one can deliver. Mira agreed it is possible that external partners might delay access, so contingency language was inserted throughout.
Joel explained that journals expect limitations sections to appear early rather than as an afterthought in revision. Mira reminded colleagues that hedging protects authors when datasets remain provisional or methods evolve mid-project.
