Following Reference Chains in a Policy Brief
Прочитайте цю статтю вголос
Увімкніть мікрофон і читайте у своєму темпі. Слова підсвічуються на ходу, і ніхто не зупиняє вас через одну помилку.
Ваш звук не потрапляє до MovaReader: розпізнає його ваш браузер. Політикою конфіденційності
Увійдіть, щоб ця сесія збереглася в історії читання.
Following Reference Chains in a Policy Brief
Marcus opened a cross-department policy brief on transit reform by naming the stakeholder forum as the anchor for later reference. The text centred on pronoun chains across a policy brief, where this, that, these, and those bound paragraphs into a single argument. Helena noted that pronoun chains fail when authors assume readers share unstated background knowledge.
Jonas reminded the group that substitution with one, ones, and such must preserve identifiable antecedents. Clara observed that former and latter work only when two referents remain unmistakably paired. By the end of the first review, advanced cohesion sounded less decorative and more structurally necessary.
Clara noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Reviewers questioned the regulatory framework, yet Jonas argued that that concern rested on an outdated sample. The
