Anaphora in an Editorial Chain of Comment
Прочитайте цю статтю вголос
Увімкніть мікрофон і читайте у своєму темпі. Слова підсвічуються на ходу, і ніхто не зупиняє вас через одну помилку.
Ваш звук не потрапляє до MovaReader: розпізнає його ваш браузер. Політикою конфіденційності
Увійдіть, щоб ця сесія збереглася в історії читання.
Anaphora in an Editorial Chain of Comment
Victoria opened a chain of editorials on university governance by naming the interim report as the anchor for later reference. The text centred on editorial reference chains in academic commentary, where this, that, these, and those bound paragraphs into a single argument. Rafael noted that pronoun chains fail when authors assume readers share unstated background knowledge.
Elena reminded the group that substitution with one, ones, and such must preserve identifiable antecedents. Simon observed that former and latter work only when two referents remain unmistakably paired. By the end of the first review, advanced cohesion sounded less decorative and more structurally necessary.
When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents. When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents.
