Pronoun Chains in a Conference Abstract Series
Прочитайте цю статтю вголос
Увімкніть мікрофон і читайте у своєму темпі. Слова підсвічуються на ходу, і ніхто не зупиняє вас через одну помилку.
Ваш звук не потрапляє до MovaReader: розпізнає його ваш браузер. Політикою конфіденційності
Увійдіть, щоб ця сесія збереглася в історії читання.
Pronoun Chains in a Conference Abstract Series
Iris opened a series of linked conference abstracts on discourse analysis by naming the evidence base as the anchor for later reference. The text centred on pronoun and substitution chains in conference abstracts, where this, that, these, and those bound paragraphs into a single argument. Leo noted that pronoun chains fail when authors assume readers share unstated background knowledge.
Nadia reminded the group that substitution with one, ones, and such must preserve identifiable antecedents. Sam observed that former and latter work only when two referents remain unmistakably paired. By the end of the first review, advanced cohesion sounded less decorative and more structurally necessary.
Reviewers questioned the revision clause, yet Nadia argued that that concern rested on an outdated sample. The interim report confirmed earlier warnings about sample bias, and this result shaped the next paragraph of a series of linked conference abstracts on discourse analysis.
