Tracing Substitution in a Funding Report
Прочитайте цю статтю вголос
Увімкніть мікрофон і читайте у своєму темпі. Слова підсвічуються на ходу, і ніхто не зупиняє вас через одну помилку.
Ваш звук не потрапляє до MovaReader: розпізнає його ваш браузер. Політикою конфіденційності
Увійдіть, щоб ця сесія збереглася в історії читання.
Tracing Substitution in a Funding Report
Hana opened a multilateral funding report on rural infrastructure by naming the pilot programme as the anchor for later reference. The text centred on one/ones and such substitution in a funding report, where this, that, these, and those bound paragraphs into a single argument. Pavel noted that pronoun chains fail when authors assume readers share unstated background knowledge.
Rosa reminded the group that substitution with one, ones, and such must preserve identifiable antecedents. Ian observed that former and latter work only when two referents remain unmistakably paired. By the end of the first review, advanced cohesion sounded less decorative and more structurally necessary.
A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. The draft contrasted the regulatory framework with the stakeholder forum; the former received cautious praise, whereas the latter drew sustained criticism.
