Lisez cet article à voix haute
Activez le micro et lisez à votre rythme. Les mots s’allument au fil de la lecture, et rien ne vous arrête quand l’un d’eux est mal prononcé.
Votre audio n’est jamais envoyé à MovaReader : c’est votre navigateur qui le reconnaît. Politique de confidentialité
Connectez-vous pour garder cette séance dans votre historique de lecture.
Chiasmus and Antimetabole in Classical Dialectical Argumentation
The deliberate structuring of chiasmus, a rhetorical figure characterized by the criss-cross inversion of syntactic elements across parallel clauses, represents one of the most sophisticated instruments of dialectical inquiry and argumentative compression. Derived from the Greek letter chi, which resembles an intersecting cross, chiasmus forces paired concepts into reciprocal confrontation. When this structural crossing involves the exact repetition of identical lexical items in reversed grammatical order, rhetoricians identify the specialized figure as antimetabole. Far from serving as mere acoustic wordplay, chiasmus operates as a rigorous cognitive engine: by reversing the syntactic relationship between subject and predicate, the speaker demonstrates that two concepts are not merely related, but fundamentally co-dependent and mutually transformative.
Classical and early modern political philosophy abounds with dialectical chiasmus deployed to overturn intuitive moral assumptions. In his political