Lisez cet article à voix haute
Activez le micro et lisez à votre rythme. Les mots s’allument au fil de la lecture, et rien ne vous arrête quand l’un d’eux est mal prononcé.
Votre audio n’est jamais envoyé à MovaReader : c’est votre navigateur qui le reconnaît. Politique de confidentialité
Connectez-vous pour garder cette séance dans votre historique de lecture.
The Art of Passing Over: Paralipsis in Cicero's Forensic Oratory
In the spring of 56 BC, the Roman Forum witnessed one of antiquity's most audacious courtroom triumphs: Marcus Tullius Cicero's defense of his young protégé Marcus Caelius Rufus. Confronting charges of political violence, civil insurrection, and attempted poisoning, Cicero recognised that a direct evidential rebuttal would prove tedious and vulnerable. Instead, he deployed paralipsis, the classical figure whereby an orator professes to pass over or suppress a sensitive accusation while simultaneously presenting every salacious detail. By masquerading as an advocate too discreet to air scandalous rumours, Cicero implanted lethal character assassinations directly into the minds of the Roman jurors.
The focal point of his rhetorical maneuvering was Clodia Metelli, a wealthy patrician widow whose hostility had instigated the prosecution. Under strict Roman forensic decorum, an orator who launched an unprovoked personal assault against a noble Roman matron risked alienating the jury.