Lisez cet article à voix haute
Activez le micro et lisez à votre rythme. Les mots s’allument au fil de la lecture, et rien ne vous arrête quand l’un d’eux est mal prononcé.
Votre audio n’est jamais envoyé à MovaReader : c’est votre navigateur qui le reconnaît. Politique de confidentialité
Connectez-vous pour garder cette séance dans votre historique de lecture.
The Cleft of Mercy: It-Clefts in Clarence Darrow's Forensic Oratory
In August 1924, inside a sweltering Chicago courtroom, legendary defense attorney Clarence Darrow delivered a twelve-hour summation that spared teenage murderers Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb from the gallows. Faced with undeniable confessions and intense public hysteria demanding capital punishment, Darrow abandoned traditional evidential disputes. Instead, he reorganised the moral battlefield through the strategic deployment of it-cleft sentences. By cleaving standard declarative statements into a two-part syntactic architecture ("It is X that Y"), Darrow isolated core ethical propositions, compelling Judge John Caverly to distinguish between primitive civic vengeance and enlightened judicial mercy.
The grammatical engine of the it-cleft allowed Darrow to refute prosecution arguments while simultaneously asserting psychiatric determinism. Rather than merely stating "Sensationalist newspapers are driving the call for execution," Darrow deployed emphatic syntactic division: