When Truth Is Not Enough: Wikipedia's Epistemic Rule | Spanish C2
Read a C2 Spanish analysis of Wikipedia's verifiability rule, reliable sources, neutrality, consensus and public traceability.
Cuando lo verdadero no basta: la regla epistémica de Wikipedia
Tap any word to see its translation
: , . , ; .
. .
: . , , , .
. , .
. , , , . .
, . , , .
, . ; , .
, . ; , .
. , , .
. : , .
. , . , , .
Keep reading with translations
Create a free account: 7 days of Pro, then 20 word translations a day or a paid plan.
About this article
What you'll learn
Source-evaluation vocabulary, epistemic argumentation, the concessive subjunctive, correlative clauses and conditional questions
This C2 reading examines Wikipedia's verifiability policy: claims must be traceable to published reliable sources, source quality depends on context, and verifiability alone does not guarantee inclusion.
After reading
Article learning block
Phrases, words, grammar, and quick practice from this text.
Phrases for training
Add useful phrases to SRS or mark them as already known.
no basta por sí sola
newis not enough on its own
The phrase says that one element, by itself, cannot satisfy the requirement.
It helps qualify an argument without rejecting that element completely.
susceptible de ser cuestionado
newlikely to be challenged
Susceptible de describes something that may undergo the action named by the infinitive.
It is useful for discussing claims that may attract objections.
dentro de su campo
newwithin their field
The phrase limits a specialist's competence to the relevant area.
It prevents an argument from granting unlimited authority.
poner a prueba
newto put to the test
Poner a prueba means examining whether something withstands checking.
It is useful in arguments about evidence and reliability.
Key words
Vocabulary that carries the school-day topic.
Traceable
rastreable
traceable
Rastreable describes something whose origin or path can be followed.
It distinguishes traceability from truth or quality.
Is challenged
impugna
is challenged
Se impugna means that someone formally disputes or contests a claim.
It is precise vocabulary for disagreement over evidence.
Scrutiny
escrutinio
scrutiny
Escrutinio is a careful and critical examination.
It names the intensity of checking applied to a source.
Self-published
autopublicado
self-published
Autopublicado describes material issued by its author without an independent publisher.
It helps classify sources by their editorial process.
Traceability
trazabilidad
traceability
Trazabilidad is the ability to reconstruct the origin and path of information.
It names the central epistemic criterion in the article.
Nuance
matiz
nuance
Matiz is a subtle difference in meaning, force or interpretation.
It helps test whether a source supports the exact wording of a claim.
Grammar in context
Patterns from the text worth noticing after reading.
Concession with aunque
aunque el editor esté seguro
although the editor may be certain
Aunque takes the subjunctive esté because the sentence concedes certainty without treating it as sufficient.
Why is esté in the subjunctive?
Real condition with si
Si una afirmación se impugna
if a claim is challenged
Si plus the present indicative presents a possible real condition and its consequence.
Which mood follows si here?
Proportional correlation
Cuanto mayor sea el escrutinio, mayor será la fiabilidad esperable
the greater the scrutiny, the greater the expected reliability
Cuanto mayor..., mayor... links two quantities that rise together; sea is subjunctive and será points to the resulting expectation.
What relationship does cuanto mayor..., mayor... express?
Bastar con que plus subjunctive
No basta con que una frase lleve una cita
it is not enough for a sentence to carry a citation
Bastar con que introduces a sufficient condition; lleve is subjunctive because that condition is evaluated rather than asserted as a fact.
Why is lleve in the subjunctive?
Conditional for a hypothetical cause
¿Qué te haría cambiar de opinión?
What would make you change your mind?
Haría is the conditional of hacer and asks about a hypothetical cause of change.
Which verb is in the conditional?
Read a book in Spanish
All C2 booksComments
Log in to leave a comment
LoginNo comments yet. Be the first!