Voz pasiva: diálogo laboral (B2)
Tiempos pasivos mixtos en conversación. Lectura B2 con traducción.
Two Colleagues Discuss Errors That Were Corrected Last Quarter
Lectura para practicar
Lee gratis. Crea una cuenta para traducir palabras, guardar tu progreso y practicar.
Practica voz pasiva en diálogo con agente by.
Nivel: B2Tema: Voz pasiva mixta; diálogo; 25+ ejemplos
Marta: Did you see the audit summary? Several invoices were duplicated by mistake in February, but the problem was spotted by finance before payments were sent twice.
Leo: Yes, and I heard that access rights were changed by IT immediately. Accounts that had been shared too widely were locked by administrators who followed the new policy.
Marta: Our team was criticised at first, yet procedures were improved by us within weeks. Checklists were introduced by the quality group, and every report is now reviewed by a second analyst before it leaves the office.
Leo: Training was offered by HR, though not everyone attended the first session. Those who missed it were reminded by email, and recordings were uploaded by trainers to the intranet.
Marta: Client data was almost exposed when a laptop was left on a train. The device was wiped remotely by security, and passwords were reset by the help desk for every affected user.
Leo: That incident was reported by the employee honestly, which helped. Lessons were learned by management, and portable drives were banned by policy until encryption was enabled by software updates.
Marta: Deadlines were missed on the Henderson file because figures were entered by interns without supervision. Supervisors were reassigned by the director, and overtime was approved by her for the correction week.
Leo: Still, the final version was praised by the client. Errors were explained transparently by our account lead, and trust was rebuilt by actions rather than by promises alone.
Marta: Templates were redesigned by designers so that formulas could not be overwritten by accident. Colour codes were added by them, and warnings are triggered automatically by the system when totals fail validation checks run by background scripts.
Leo: External consultants were hired in April, and their report was published internally last Friday. Recommendations were accepted by the board, and a timeline was agreed by department heads who met for a full day.
Marta: Bonuses were not cut, which surprised some staff. Instead, responsibility was shared by leadership, and credit was given by the CEO to teams who fixed issues quickly.
Leo: Next quarter will be monitored closely. Reports will be sampled randomly by auditors, and feedback will be collected by anonymous surveys distributed by the communications office.
Marta: If mistakes are made again, they will be caught earlier because controls have been strengthened by people who prefer prevention to apology. That attitude was encouraged by the new chief operating officer, and it is being copied by units that were previously relaxed about reviews.
Leo: Well, the story could have been worse. Damage was limited because alert colleagues spoke up, and systems were updated by professionals who understood that human error is reduced when tools are designed carefully.
Marta: Exactly. When we finish this coffee, the revised handbook should be read by both of us. Changes were summarised by legal, and examples were added by trainers who illustrate cases where data was mishandled and later corrected by prompt reporting.
Leo: Agreed. Let us
Leo: Yes, and I heard that access rights were changed by IT immediately. Accounts that had been shared too widely were locked by administrators who followed the new policy.
Marta: Our team was criticised at first, yet procedures were improved by us within weeks. Checklists were introduced by the quality group, and every report is now reviewed by a second analyst before it leaves the office.
Leo: Training was offered by HR, though not everyone attended the first session. Those who missed it were reminded by email, and recordings were uploaded by trainers to the intranet.
Marta: Client data was almost exposed when a laptop was left on a train. The device was wiped remotely by security, and passwords were reset by the help desk for every affected user.
Leo: That incident was reported by the employee honestly, which helped. Lessons were learned by management, and portable drives were banned by policy until encryption was enabled by software updates.
Marta: Deadlines were missed on the Henderson file because figures were entered by interns without supervision. Supervisors were reassigned by the director, and overtime was approved by her for the correction week.
Leo: Still, the final version was praised by the client. Errors were explained transparently by our account lead, and trust was rebuilt by actions rather than by promises alone.
Marta: Templates were redesigned by designers so that formulas could not be overwritten by accident. Colour codes were added by them, and warnings are triggered automatically by the system when totals fail validation checks run by background scripts.
Leo: External consultants were hired in April, and their report was published internally last Friday. Recommendations were accepted by the board, and a timeline was agreed by department heads who met for a full day.
Marta: Bonuses were not cut, which surprised some staff. Instead, responsibility was shared by leadership, and credit was given by the CEO to teams who fixed issues quickly.
Leo: Next quarter will be monitored closely. Reports will be sampled randomly by auditors, and feedback will be collected by anonymous surveys distributed by the communications office.
Marta: If mistakes are made again, they will be caught earlier because controls have been strengthened by people who prefer prevention to apology. That attitude was encouraged by the new chief operating officer, and it is being copied by units that were previously relaxed about reviews.
Leo: Well, the story could have been worse. Damage was limited because alert colleagues spoke up, and systems were updated by professionals who understood that human error is reduced when tools are designed carefully.
Marta: Exactly. When we finish this coffee, the revised handbook should be read by both of us. Changes were summarised by legal, and examples were added by trainers who illustrate cases where data was mishandled and later corrected by prompt reporting.
Leo: Agreed. Let us
Sobre el artículo
Nivel B2Enfoque de lectura
Qué aprenderás
Voz pasiva mixta; diálogo; 25+ ejemplos
Practica voz pasiva en diálogo con agente by.
Comentarios
Inicia sesión para dejar un comentario
Iniciar SesiónAún no hay comentarios. ¡Sé el primero!
