Repaso gramatical C1: cleft en panel
Integra modalidad, elipsis, cleft y fronting en lectura C1. Inglés con traducción.
Panel Transcript: Not Only Should Policy Front Equity
Lectura para practicar
Lee gratis. Crea una cuenta para traducir palabras, guardar tu progreso y practicar.
Practica cleft and fronting in panel discussion en textos integrados de repaso C1.
Nivel: C1Tema: Repaso C1: cleft en panel; modalidad, elipsis, cleft, fronting
Moderator: Opening question: what the panel proposes is phased transition, not abrupt shutdown.
Panelist A: It is investment that regions lack, and lack it they do where unemployment already strains public budgets.
Panelist B: Not only should policy front equity; it must do so before carbon markets mature.
Audience member: Ought legislators to dare bolder interim targets?
Panelist C: They ought, and might have moved faster had prior frameworks substituted vague pledges with caps.
Panelist A: So did several Nordic states demonstrate feasibility, and Ireland did as well at smaller scale.
Moderator: What voters need is trustworthy modality, not hedging that sounds like evasion.
Panelist B: They needn't have dismissed microgrids; needn't have, yet dismiss them some utilities did.
Closing: It was dialogue that the event foregrounded, and foreground it we must in every subsequent briefing.
Moderator: What the panel proposes is phased transition, not abrupt shutdown of existing grids.
Panelist A: It is investment that we lack, and lack it we do in regions already facing unemployment.
Panelist B: Not only should policy front equity concerns; it must do so before carbon markets mature further.
Moderator: Ought legislators to dare bolder targets? Several audience members nodded when the question was cleft for emphasis.
Panelist C: We might have achieved more had the previous framework substituted vague pledges with measurable caps.
What voters need is language they trust, and trust it they will not if modal hedging sounds like evasion.
Panelist A: So did the Nordic states demonstrate feasibility, and Ireland did as well at smaller scale.
Moderator: Not until the Q&A did a student front her question with inversion that silenced the hall briefly.
Panelist B: They needn't have dismissed community microgrids; needn't have, yet dismiss them some utilities did.
What closure requires is integration of modality, fronting, and ellipsis in policy texts accessible to non-experts.
Moderator: What the panel proposes is phased transition, not abrupt shutdown of existing grids.
Panelist A: It is investment that we lack, and lack it we do in regions already facing unemployment.
Panelist B: Not only should policy front equity concerns; it must do so before carbon markets mature further.
Moderator: Ought legislators to dare bolder targets? Several audience members nodded when the question was cleft for emphasis.
Panelist C: We might have achieved more had the previous framework substituted vague pledges with measurable caps.
What voters need is language they trust, and trust it they will not if modal hedging sounds like evasion.
Panelist A: So did the Nordic states demonstrate feasibility, and Ireland did as well at smaller scale.
Moderator: Not until the Q&A did a student front her question with inversion that silenced the hall briefly.
Panelist B: They needn't have dismissed community microgrids; needn't have, yet dismiss them some utilities did.
What closure requires is integration of modality, fronting, and ellipsis in policy texts accessible to non-experts.
Moderator: What the panel proposes is phased transition, not abrupt shutdown of existing grids.
Panelist A: It is
Panelist A: It is investment that regions lack, and lack it they do where unemployment already strains public budgets.
Panelist B: Not only should policy front equity; it must do so before carbon markets mature.
Audience member: Ought legislators to dare bolder interim targets?
Panelist C: They ought, and might have moved faster had prior frameworks substituted vague pledges with caps.
Panelist A: So did several Nordic states demonstrate feasibility, and Ireland did as well at smaller scale.
Moderator: What voters need is trustworthy modality, not hedging that sounds like evasion.
Panelist B: They needn't have dismissed microgrids; needn't have, yet dismiss them some utilities did.
Closing: It was dialogue that the event foregrounded, and foreground it we must in every subsequent briefing.
Moderator: What the panel proposes is phased transition, not abrupt shutdown of existing grids.
Panelist A: It is investment that we lack, and lack it we do in regions already facing unemployment.
Panelist B: Not only should policy front equity concerns; it must do so before carbon markets mature further.
Moderator: Ought legislators to dare bolder targets? Several audience members nodded when the question was cleft for emphasis.
Panelist C: We might have achieved more had the previous framework substituted vague pledges with measurable caps.
What voters need is language they trust, and trust it they will not if modal hedging sounds like evasion.
Panelist A: So did the Nordic states demonstrate feasibility, and Ireland did as well at smaller scale.
Moderator: Not until the Q&A did a student front her question with inversion that silenced the hall briefly.
Panelist B: They needn't have dismissed community microgrids; needn't have, yet dismiss them some utilities did.
What closure requires is integration of modality, fronting, and ellipsis in policy texts accessible to non-experts.
Moderator: What the panel proposes is phased transition, not abrupt shutdown of existing grids.
Panelist A: It is investment that we lack, and lack it we do in regions already facing unemployment.
Panelist B: Not only should policy front equity concerns; it must do so before carbon markets mature further.
Moderator: Ought legislators to dare bolder targets? Several audience members nodded when the question was cleft for emphasis.
Panelist C: We might have achieved more had the previous framework substituted vague pledges with measurable caps.
What voters need is language they trust, and trust it they will not if modal hedging sounds like evasion.
Panelist A: So did the Nordic states demonstrate feasibility, and Ireland did as well at smaller scale.
Moderator: Not until the Q&A did a student front her question with inversion that silenced the hall briefly.
Panelist B: They needn't have dismissed community microgrids; needn't have, yet dismiss them some utilities did.
What closure requires is integration of modality, fronting, and ellipsis in policy texts accessible to non-experts.
Moderator: What the panel proposes is phased transition, not abrupt shutdown of existing grids.
Panelist A: It is
Sobre el artículo
Nivel C1Enfoque de lectura
Qué aprenderás
Repaso C1: cleft en panel; modalidad, elipsis, cleft, fronting
Practica cleft and fronting in panel discussion en textos integrados de repaso C1.
Comentarios
Inicia sesión para dejar un comentario
Iniciar SesiónAún no hay comentarios. ¡Sé el primero!
