Розширена когезія: ланцюги референції (C1)
C1 текст про cataphora at the start of a white paper: this/that, анафора, заміна one/ones у академічному контексті. Англійська з перекладом.
Cataphoric Reference in a White Paper Opening
Читання для практики
Читайте безкоштовно. Створіть акаунт, щоб перекладати слова, зберігати прогрес і тренуватися.
Стаття тренує зв'язність і ланцюжки відсилань у контексті a government white paper on digital identity. Містить багато цільових конструкцій для автоматизації форми.
Рівень: C1Тема: Розширена когезія; this/that/these/those, pronoun chains, anaphora/cataphora, one/ones, such, the former/the latter; 30+ examples
Anya opened a government white paper on digital identity by naming the consultation window as the anchor for later reference. The text centred on cataphora at the start of a white paper, where this, that, these, and those bound paragraphs into a single argument. Joel noted that pronoun chains fail when authors assume readers share unstated background knowledge.
Luca reminded the group that substitution with one, ones, and such must preserve identifiable antecedents. Mira observed that former and latter work only when two referents remain unmistakably paired. By the end of the first review, advanced cohesion sounded less decorative and more structurally necessary.
Several teams misread the funding gap; those misreadings spread because demonstratives lacked clear antecedents. The committee approved a revised version of the consultation window, but the earlier one still appeared in the appendix. In a government white paper on digital identity, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference.
Luca and Joel reviewed a government white paper on digital identity, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims. Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page. The editors asked Luca to clarify demonstratives, and Luca did so before resubmitting a government white paper on digital identity.
Joel noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Joel noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Luca and Mira reviewed a government white paper on digital identity, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims.
During revision of a government white paper on digital identity, Mira flagged cataphoric openings that delayed clarity for non-expert readers. Mira listed three weak links in the draft, and these gaps appeared again when Luca reread section two. Readers expect that every demonstrative in a government white paper on digital identity will point to an identifiable noun phrase.
Mira noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Having established the main claim, Anya used connective reference to extend the consultation period without breaking the chain. Anya and Mira reviewed a government white paper on digital identity, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims.
Anya repeated the phrase the revision clause at paragraph openings to strengthen lexical cohesion across a government white paper on digital identity. This is what the policy team feared most: the interim report would collapse once a government white paper on digital identity reached a wider audience. The committee approved a revised version of the pilot programme, but the earlier one still appeared in the appendix.
Readers expect that every demonstrative in a government white paper on digital identity will point to an identifiable noun phrase. A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page.
When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents.
Luca reminded the group that substitution with one, ones, and such must preserve identifiable antecedents. Mira observed that former and latter work only when two referents remain unmistakably paired. By the end of the first review, advanced cohesion sounded less decorative and more structurally necessary.
Several teams misread the funding gap; those misreadings spread because demonstratives lacked clear antecedents. The committee approved a revised version of the consultation window, but the earlier one still appeared in the appendix. In a government white paper on digital identity, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference.
Luca and Joel reviewed a government white paper on digital identity, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims. Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page. The editors asked Luca to clarify demonstratives, and Luca did so before resubmitting a government white paper on digital identity.
Joel noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Joel noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Luca and Mira reviewed a government white paper on digital identity, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims.
During revision of a government white paper on digital identity, Mira flagged cataphoric openings that delayed clarity for non-expert readers. Mira listed three weak links in the draft, and these gaps appeared again when Luca reread section two. Readers expect that every demonstrative in a government white paper on digital identity will point to an identifiable noun phrase.
Mira noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Having established the main claim, Anya used connective reference to extend the consultation period without breaking the chain. Anya and Mira reviewed a government white paper on digital identity, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims.
Anya repeated the phrase the revision clause at paragraph openings to strengthen lexical cohesion across a government white paper on digital identity. This is what the policy team feared most: the interim report would collapse once a government white paper on digital identity reached a wider audience. The committee approved a revised version of the pilot programme, but the earlier one still appeared in the appendix.
Readers expect that every demonstrative in a government white paper on digital identity will point to an identifiable noun phrase. A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page.
When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents.
Про статтю
Рівень C1Фокус читання
Що вивчите
Розширена когезія; this/that/these/those, pronoun chains, anaphora/cataphora, one/ones, such, the former/the latter; 30+ examples
Стаття тренує зв'язність і ланцюжки відсилань у контексті a government white paper on digital identity. Містить багато цільових конструкцій для автоматизації форми.
Коментарі
Увійдіть, щоб залишити коментар
УвійтиПоки що немає коментарів. Будьте першим!
