Розширена когезія: ланцюги референції (C1)
C1 текст про lexical repetition and synonym chains in analysis: this/that, анафора, заміна one/ones у академічному контексті. Англійська з перекладом.
Lexical Cohesion in a Think-Tank Analysis
Читання для практики
Читайте безкоштовно. Створіть акаунт, щоб перекладати слова, зберігати прогрес і тренуватися.
Стаття тренує зв'язність і ланцюжки відсилань у контексті a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends. Містить багато цільових конструкцій для автоматизації форми.
Рівень: C1Тема: Розширена когезія; this/that/these/those, pronoun chains, anaphora/cataphora, one/ones, such, the former/the latter; 30+ examples
Greta opened a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends by naming the revision clause as the anchor for later reference. The text centred on lexical repetition and synonym chains in analysis, where this, that, these, and those bound paragraphs into a single argument. Milan noted that pronoun chains fail when authors assume readers share unstated background knowledge.
Sofia reminded the group that substitution with one, ones, and such must preserve identifiable antecedents. Arun observed that former and latter work only when two referents remain unmistakably paired. By the end of the first review, advanced cohesion sounded less decorative and more structurally necessary.
A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page. Readers expect that every demonstrative in a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends will point to an identifiable noun phrase.
Readers expect that every demonstrative in a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends will point to an identifiable noun phrase. A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. Authors introduced the evidence base in chapter one; the same construct reappeared whenever the argument turned comparative.
Readers expect that every demonstrative in a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends will point to an identifiable noun phrase. The committee approved a revised version of the pilot programme, but the earlier one still appeared in the appendix. During revision of a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends, Sofia flagged cataphoric openings that delayed clarity for non-expert readers.
The baseline survey showed uneven uptake across districts; such findings recur whenever authors rely on distant anaphora. In a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference. Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page.
A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page. Arun and Greta reviewed a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims.
Milan summarised the revision clause, and it remained central when the authors revised a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends. When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents. In a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference.
Milan noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Greta listed three weak links in the draft, and these gaps appeared again when Arun reread section two. In a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference.
Readers expect that every demonstrative in a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends will point to an identifiable noun phrase.
Sofia reminded the group that substitution with one, ones, and such must preserve identifiable antecedents. Arun observed that former and latter work only when two referents remain unmistakably paired. By the end of the first review, advanced cohesion sounded less decorative and more structurally necessary.
A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page. Readers expect that every demonstrative in a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends will point to an identifiable noun phrase.
Readers expect that every demonstrative in a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends will point to an identifiable noun phrase. A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. Authors introduced the evidence base in chapter one; the same construct reappeared whenever the argument turned comparative.
Readers expect that every demonstrative in a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends will point to an identifiable noun phrase. The committee approved a revised version of the pilot programme, but the earlier one still appeared in the appendix. During revision of a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends, Sofia flagged cataphoric openings that delayed clarity for non-expert readers.
The baseline survey showed uneven uptake across districts; such findings recur whenever authors rely on distant anaphora. In a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference. Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page.
A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page. Arun and Greta reviewed a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims.
Milan summarised the revision clause, and it remained central when the authors revised a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends. When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents. In a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference.
Milan noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Greta listed three weak links in the draft, and these gaps appeared again when Arun reread section two. In a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference.
Readers expect that every demonstrative in a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends will point to an identifiable noun phrase.
Про статтю
Рівень C1Фокус читання
Що вивчите
Розширена когезія; this/that/these/those, pronoun chains, anaphora/cataphora, one/ones, such, the former/the latter; 30+ examples
Стаття тренує зв'язність і ланцюжки відсилань у контексті a think-tank analysis of labour migration trends. Містить багато цільових конструкцій для автоматизації форми.
Коментарі
Увійдіть, щоб залишити коментар
УвійтиПоки що немає коментарів. Будьте першим!
