Розширена когезія: ланцюги референції (C1)
C1 текст про formal memo on demonstratives and lexical ties: this/that, анафора, заміна one/ones у академічному контексті. Англійська з перекладом.
Internal Memo on Reference Chains
Читання для практики
Читайте безкоштовно. Створіть акаунт, щоб перекладати слова, зберігати прогрес і тренуватися.
Стаття тренує зв'язність і ланцюжки відсилань у контексті an internal memo from a university writing centre. Містить багато цільових конструкцій для автоматизації форми.
Рівень: C1Тема: Розширена когезія; this/that/these/those, pronoun chains, anaphora/cataphora, one/ones, such, the former/the latter; 25+ examples
To: All tutors. From: Dr Park. Re: Demonstratives in student drafts. This memo summarises recurring errors: that without a clear antecedent breaks academic cohesion. These patterns appear when writers substitute one for a complex noun phrase too early.
Such habits are reversible if authors name the former topic before using the latter label. Those who teach report writing should model connective chains across paragraphs. Please ensure each tutorial addresses this issue before mid-term submissions.
During revision of an internal memo from a university writing centre, Amir flagged cataphoric openings that delayed clarity for non-expert readers. Authors introduced the baseline survey in chapter one; the same construct reappeared whenever the argument turned comparative. Readers expect that every demonstrative in an internal memo from a university writing centre will point to an identifiable noun phrase.
Yuki summarised the evidence base, and it remained central when the authors revised an internal memo from a university writing centre. The revision clause showed uneven uptake across districts, and this result shaped the next paragraph of an internal memo from a university writing centre. Having established the main claim, Amir used connective reference to verify that demonstratives have clear antecedents without breaking the chain.
Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page. In an internal memo from a university writing centre, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference. Yuki repeated the phrase the stakeholder forum at paragraph openings to strengthen lexical cohesion across an internal memo from a university writing centre.
Dr Park and Yuki reviewed an internal memo from a university writing centre, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims. Readers expect that every demonstrative in an internal memo from a university writing centre will point to an identifiable noun phrase. When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents.
Readers expect that every demonstrative in an internal memo from a university writing centre will point to an identifiable noun phrase. A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. The implementation timeline revealed persistent measurement error, and this result shaped the next paragraph of an internal memo from a university writing centre.
During revision of an internal memo from a university writing centre, Yuki flagged cataphoric openings that delayed clarity for non-expert readers. A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. Having established the main claim, Amir used connective reference to clarify the reference chain in section four without breaking the chain.
In an internal memo from a university writing centre, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference. The editors asked Yuki to clarify demonstratives, and Yuki did so before resubmitting an internal memo from a university writing centre. A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit.
When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents.
Such habits are reversible if authors name the former topic before using the latter label. Those who teach report writing should model connective chains across paragraphs. Please ensure each tutorial addresses this issue before mid-term submissions.
During revision of an internal memo from a university writing centre, Amir flagged cataphoric openings that delayed clarity for non-expert readers. Authors introduced the baseline survey in chapter one; the same construct reappeared whenever the argument turned comparative. Readers expect that every demonstrative in an internal memo from a university writing centre will point to an identifiable noun phrase.
Yuki summarised the evidence base, and it remained central when the authors revised an internal memo from a university writing centre. The revision clause showed uneven uptake across districts, and this result shaped the next paragraph of an internal memo from a university writing centre. Having established the main claim, Amir used connective reference to verify that demonstratives have clear antecedents without breaking the chain.
Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page. In an internal memo from a university writing centre, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference. Yuki repeated the phrase the stakeholder forum at paragraph openings to strengthen lexical cohesion across an internal memo from a university writing centre.
Dr Park and Yuki reviewed an internal memo from a university writing centre, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims. Readers expect that every demonstrative in an internal memo from a university writing centre will point to an identifiable noun phrase. When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents.
Readers expect that every demonstrative in an internal memo from a university writing centre will point to an identifiable noun phrase. A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. The implementation timeline revealed persistent measurement error, and this result shaped the next paragraph of an internal memo from a university writing centre.
During revision of an internal memo from a university writing centre, Yuki flagged cataphoric openings that delayed clarity for non-expert readers. A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. Having established the main claim, Amir used connective reference to clarify the reference chain in section four without breaking the chain.
In an internal memo from a university writing centre, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference. The editors asked Yuki to clarify demonstratives, and Yuki did so before resubmitting an internal memo from a university writing centre. A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit.
When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents.
Про статтю
Рівень C1Фокус читання
Що вивчите
Розширена когезія; this/that/these/those, pronoun chains, anaphora/cataphora, one/ones, such, the former/the latter; 25+ examples
Стаття тренує зв'язність і ланцюжки відсилань у контексті an internal memo from a university writing centre. Містить багато цільових конструкцій для автоматизації форми.
Коментарі
Увійдіть, щоб залишити коментар
УвійтиПоки що немає коментарів. Будьте першим!
