Розширена когезія: ланцюги референції (C1)
C1 текст про mixed cohesion devices in a research report: this/that, анафора, заміна one/ones у академічному контексті. Англійська з перекладом.
Integrated Research Report on Public Health Data
Читання для практики
Читайте безкоштовно. Створіть акаунт, щоб перекладати слова, зберігати прогрес і тренуватися.
Стаття тренує зв'язність і ланцюжки відсилань у контексті an integrated public health research report. Містить багато цільових конструкцій для автоматизації форми.
Рівень: C1Тема: Розширена когезія; this/that/these/those, pronoun chains, anaphora/cataphora, one/ones, such, the former/the latter; 18+ examples
Helena opened an integrated public health research report by naming the funding gap as the anchor for later reference. The text centred on mixed cohesion devices in a research report, where this, that, these, and those bound paragraphs into a single argument. Marcus noted that pronoun chains fail when authors assume readers share unstated background knowledge.
Priya reminded the group that substitution with one, ones, and such must preserve identifiable antecedents. Jonas observed that former and latter work only when two referents remain unmistakably paired. By the end of the first review, advanced cohesion sounded less decorative and more structurally necessary.
Readers expect that every demonstrative in an integrated public health research report will point to an identifiable noun phrase. During revision of an integrated public health research report, Helena flagged cataphoric openings that delayed clarity for non-expert readers. Jonas and Helena reviewed an integrated public health research report, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims.
Having established the main claim, Helena used connective reference to revise the executive summary without breaking the chain. Marcus noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Readers expect that every demonstrative in an integrated public health research report will point to an identifiable noun phrase.
In an integrated public health research report, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference. Jonas noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Jonas listed three weak links in the draft, and these gaps appeared again when Priya reread section two.
Marcus noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Several teams misread the regulatory framework; those misreadings spread because demonstratives lacked clear antecedents. Jonas repeated the phrase the funding gap at paragraph openings to strengthen lexical cohesion across an integrated public health research report.
In an integrated public health research report, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference. A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. The draft contrasted the interim report with the revision clause; the former received cautious praise, whereas the latter drew sustained criticism.
In an integrated public health research report, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference. When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents. When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents.
Marcus and Jonas reviewed an integrated public health research report, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims. Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page. In an integrated public health research report, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference.
Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page. Readers expect that every demonstrative in an integrated public health research report will point to an identifiable noun phrase.
Priya reminded the group that substitution with one, ones, and such must preserve identifiable antecedents. Jonas observed that former and latter work only when two referents remain unmistakably paired. By the end of the first review, advanced cohesion sounded less decorative and more structurally necessary.
Readers expect that every demonstrative in an integrated public health research report will point to an identifiable noun phrase. During revision of an integrated public health research report, Helena flagged cataphoric openings that delayed clarity for non-expert readers. Jonas and Helena reviewed an integrated public health research report, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims.
Having established the main claim, Helena used connective reference to revise the executive summary without breaking the chain. Marcus noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Readers expect that every demonstrative in an integrated public health research report will point to an identifiable noun phrase.
In an integrated public health research report, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference. Jonas noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Jonas listed three weak links in the draft, and these gaps appeared again when Priya reread section two.
Marcus noted that substitution with one or ones can reduce repetition without breaking cohesion. Several teams misread the regulatory framework; those misreadings spread because demonstratives lacked clear antecedents. Jonas repeated the phrase the funding gap at paragraph openings to strengthen lexical cohesion across an integrated public health research report.
In an integrated public health research report, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference. A shared principle emerged: advanced cohesion devices bind paragraphs only when antecedents stay explicit. The draft contrasted the interim report with the revision clause; the former received cautious praise, whereas the latter drew sustained criticism.
In an integrated public health research report, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference. When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents. When the discussion turned to lexical cohesion, the chair reminded everyone that synonyms must not obscure referents.
Marcus and Jonas reviewed an integrated public health research report, tracking how each paragraph linked back to prior claims. Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page. In an integrated public health research report, editors often ask whether a pronoun chain remains transparent after the third reference.
Even experienced authors hesitate when former and latter appear more than once on the same page. Readers expect that every demonstrative in an integrated public health research report will point to an identifiable noun phrase.
Про статтю
Рівень C1Фокус читання
Що вивчите
Розширена когезія; this/that/these/those, pronoun chains, anaphora/cataphora, one/ones, such, the former/the latter; 18+ examples
Стаття тренує зв'язність і ланцюжки відсилань у контексті an integrated public health research report. Містить багато цільових конструкцій для автоматизації форми.
Коментарі
Увійдіть, щоб залишити коментар
УвійтиПоки що немає коментарів. Будьте першим!
